Sir, on the last page the prosecutor just said, “OBJECTION!” then the judge replied, “sustained”. What was the grounds against this without the lawyer even saying anything besides “OBJECTION!”?
Patrick, the question “Is he a thief?” speaks for itself.
Sir, on the last page the prosecutor just said, “OBJECTION!” then the judge replied, “sustained”. What was the grounds against this without the lawyer even saying anything besides “OBJECTION!”?
Patrick, the question “Is he a thief?” speaks for itself.